![]() |
|
| by Charles H. Booras, MD revised 5/22/97 |
| When Americans see a doctor, their problem is
most often a cold. But running a close second is acute low-back pain, for which the
national medical bill is $24 billion annually. A large part of this bill is for
surgery, such as fusion of the lower (lumbar) spine. The rate of surgery for low-back pain
is twice as high in this country as in other industrialized nations. According to Dr. Richard Deyo of the University of Washington, who heads a five-year study of back-pain treatment, "these statistics are sobering" because lumbar spinal surgery is frequently unsuccessful. Surgical rates vary widely within this country. For example, they vary sevenfold among the largest counties of the state of Washington. Such discrepancies often indicate that something is amiss. Contributing to the rush to surgery has been the widespread
use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a relatively new diagnostic technique that uses
magnetic fields and radio waves. An MRI reveals spinal architecture accurately and in much
more detail than an X-ray. But what may look like a trouble spot often is not.
Abnormal-looking disks in the lumbar spine are almost as likely to show up in people with
no back pain as in those with pain. That is, abnormalities that show up in MRIs are not
necessarily related to back pain. And some people with severe back pain have
normal-looking MRIs. In a recent study published in the New England Journal
of Medicine, 98 people with no back pain were scanned. Almost two-thirds of
them proved to have some spinal abnormality, such as protruded, herniated, or degenerated
disks. Such abnormalities, the study concluded, may simply be coincidental-meaning that
they don't cause the pain. In an editorial accompanying the study, Dr. Deyo
urged doctors not to rush to use MRIs to diagnose patients with sciatica or uncomplicated
acute low-back pain (that is, pain not due to underlying illness or injury and not
involving nerve damage or paralysis). The best plan is to try more conservative treatments
first. In another study that appeared in Annals of
Internal Medicine, "practice styles" of doctors treating back pain in a
large HMO were compared. Doctors who routinely prescribed bed rest and prescription drugs
were significantly less successful with their patients than those who taught patients how
to deal with their own back problems through exercise and life-style changes and who
prescribed drugs less frequently. Particularly, use of narcotic type pain killers and
smoking is associated with a delayed recovery from back pain. In addition, patients seemed
to benefit from being told that back pain is amenable to self-care, that it usually goes
away in a reasonable time, and that even though it becomes chronic in some cases, it's
manageable. Patients who were taught self-care did better and were also better satisfied. Dr. Deyo recommends the following for acute low-back pain:
Rarely, persistent or severe back pain can be a sign of some underlying illness (such as cancer, infections, or joint disease), and if your condition worsens, you may need further diagnosis or even an MRI. But, within 12 weeks, according to Dr. Deyo, nearly 95% of back pain patients have returned to work. A bit of reassurance about the likelihood of rapid recovery can go a long way toward helping back pain patients recuperate. |
Modified from an article in the "University of California at Berkeley Wellness Letter", December, 1994.